<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The FriendFeed Disjointed Comments Problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fpettit.com/2008/04/03/the-friendfeed-disjointed-comments-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fpettit.com/2008/04/03/the-friendfeed-disjointed-comments-problem/</link>
	<description>Tech, Life, &#38; Stuff...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:19:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FriendFeed Noise Solutions &#124; FPettit.com</title>
		<link>http://www.fpettit.com/2008/04/03/the-friendfeed-disjointed-comments-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>FriendFeed Noise Solutions &#124; FPettit.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fpettit.com/?p=42#comment-16</guid>
		<description>[...] first discussed the multiple link problem in conjunction with what I called &#8216;The FriendFeed Disjointed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first discussed the multiple link problem in conjunction with what I called &#8216;The FriendFeed Disjointed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comments Floating in the Blogosphere &#124; FPettit.com</title>
		<link>http://www.fpettit.com/2008/04/03/the-friendfeed-disjointed-comments-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Comments Floating in the Blogosphere &#124; FPettit.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fpettit.com/?p=42#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] blogosphere is a buzz. The conversation is about comments. I wrote the other day about &#8220;the FriendFeed disjointed comments problem.&#8221; My post was pointing out how FriendFeed could help move the conversation back to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogosphere is a buzz. The conversation is about comments. I wrote the other day about &#8220;the FriendFeed disjointed comments problem.&#8221; My post was pointing out how FriendFeed could help move the conversation back to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are Del.icio.us Updates Broken on FriendFeed? &#124; FPettit.com</title>
		<link>http://www.fpettit.com/2008/04/03/the-friendfeed-disjointed-comments-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Are Del.icio.us Updates Broken on FriendFeed? &#124; FPettit.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fpettit.com/?p=42#comment-6</guid>
		<description>[...] noticed this last week when Louis Gray linked to my post &#8220;The FriendFeed Disjointed Comments Problem.&#8221;  I noticed then that it was not in his [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] noticed this last week when Louis Gray linked to my post &#8220;The FriendFeed Disjointed Comments Problem.&#8221;  I noticed then that it was not in his [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklin</title>
		<link>http://www.fpettit.com/2008/04/03/the-friendfeed-disjointed-comments-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Franklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fpettit.com/?p=42#comment-359</guid>
		<description>My proposed solution is for FriendFeed  to group the links together and show all the conversation together in one block.   All the likes together.  Then a display of all the comments.  This would be a lot less confusing on the FriendFeed.    Then you could submit to 7 different places and it would not be as annoying.  Also then someone could more easily use the API to get the conversation back on the original blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My proposed solution is for FriendFeed  to group the links together and show all the conversation together in one block.   All the likes together.  Then a display of all the comments.  This would be a lot less confusing on the FriendFeed.    Then you could submit to 7 different places and it would not be as annoying.  Also then someone could more easily use the API to get the conversation back on the original blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklin</title>
		<link>http://www.fpettit.com/2008/04/03/the-friendfeed-disjointed-comments-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Franklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fpettit.com/?p=42#comment-135</guid>
		<description>My proposed solution is for FriendFeed  to group the links together and show all the conversation together in one block.   All the likes together.  Then a display of all the comments.  This would be a lot less confusing on the FriendFeed.    Then you could submit to 7 different places and it would not be as annoying.  Also then someone could more easily use the API to get the conversation back on the original blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My proposed solution is for FriendFeed  to group the links together and show all the conversation together in one block.   All the likes together.  Then a display of all the comments.  This would be a lot less confusing on the FriendFeed.    Then you could submit to 7 different places and it would not be as annoying.  Also then someone could more easily use the API to get the conversation back on the original blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.fpettit.com/2008/04/03/the-friendfeed-disjointed-comments-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 03:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fpettit.com/?p=42#comment-134</guid>
		<description>So... I could: 1) Post the blog post, 2) Post it to FriendFeed, 3) Add it to Del.icio.us, 4) Submit it to Digg, 5) Hype it on StumbleUpon, 6) Share it on Google Reader, and 7) Send a Twitter about it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On FriendFeed, that would get annoying (one reason I usually don&#039;t do that). But there are definitely people who only get it on the blog, or on Google Reader or on Twitter, so there are often duplicates.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is the proposed solution?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Louis Gray added a new post &quot;TechMeme Such and Such&quot; and shared it on Google Reader and sent a Tweet: &quot;TechMeme Such and Such&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; I could: 1) Post the blog post, 2) Post it to FriendFeed, 3) Add it to Del.icio.us, 4) Submit it to Digg, 5) Hype it on StumbleUpon, 6) Share it on Google Reader, and 7) Send a Twitter about it.</p>
<p>On FriendFeed, that would get annoying (one reason I usually don&#39;t do that). But there are definitely people who only get it on the blog, or on Google Reader or on Twitter, so there are often duplicates.</p>
<p>What is the proposed solution?</p>
<p>&#8220;Louis Gray added a new post &#8220;TechMeme Such and Such&#8221; and shared it on Google Reader and sent a Tweet: &#8220;TechMeme Such and Such&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
