<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FriendFeed Noise Solutions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fpettit.com/2008/04/25/friendfeed-noise-solutions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fpettit.com/2008/04/25/friendfeed-noise-solutions/</link>
	<description>Tech, Life, &#38; Stuff...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:19:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Corvida Raven</title>
		<link>http://www.fpettit.com/2008/04/25/friendfeed-noise-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>Corvida Raven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fpettit.com/?p=59#comment-323</guid>
		<description>Now that would go over great with the entire community. I would definitely like the option instead of having people left out. Both views are pretty interesting and could work well for controlling duplicates and for organizational purposes. I just think the person-centric view is more manageable for me :P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hopefully we can see both options implemented though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that would go over great with the entire community. I would definitely like the option instead of having people left out. Both views are pretty interesting and could work well for controlling duplicates and for organizational purposes. I just think the person-centric view is more manageable for me <img src='http://www.fpettit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Hopefully we can see both options implemented though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hutch Carpenter</title>
		<link>http://www.fpettit.com/2008/04/25/friendfeed-noise-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Hutch Carpenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fpettit.com/?p=59#comment-324</guid>
		<description>Franklin - I think you&#039;re right.  I could see trying both person-centric and link-centric.  Link-centric would be really interesting, with the one concern that it creates an echo chamber effect.  Everyone focuses only on the link with the most action.  But Techmeme shows there is interest in those kind of approaches.  Perhaps link-centric could be in a separate tab.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Franklin &#8211; I think you&#39;re right.  I could see trying both person-centric and link-centric.  Link-centric would be really interesting, with the one concern that it creates an echo chamber effect.  Everyone focuses only on the link with the most action.  But Techmeme shows there is interest in those kind of approaches.  Perhaps link-centric could be in a separate tab.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corvida</title>
		<link>http://www.fpettit.com/2008/04/25/friendfeed-noise-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Corvida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fpettit.com/?p=59#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Now that would go over great with the entire community. I would definitely like the option instead of having people left out. Both views are pretty interesting and could work well for controlling duplicates and for organizational purposes. I just think the person-centric view is more manageable for me :P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hopefully we can see both options implemented though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that would go over great with the entire community. I would definitely like the option instead of having people left out. Both views are pretty interesting and could work well for controlling duplicates and for organizational purposes. I just think the person-centric view is more manageable for me <img src='http://www.fpettit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Hopefully we can see both options implemented though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hutch Carpenter</title>
		<link>http://www.fpettit.com/2008/04/25/friendfeed-noise-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Hutch Carpenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fpettit.com/?p=59#comment-179</guid>
		<description>Franklin - I think you&#039;re right.  I could see trying both person-centric and link-centric.  Link-centric would be really interesting, with the one concern that it creates an echo chamber effect.  Everyone focuses only on the link with the most action.  But Techmeme shows there is interest in those kind of approaches.  Perhaps link-centric could be in a separate tab.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Franklin &#8211; I think you&#39;re right.  I could see trying both person-centric and link-centric.  Link-centric would be really interesting, with the one concern that it creates an echo chamber effect.  Everyone focuses only on the link with the most action.  But Techmeme shows there is interest in those kind of approaches.  Perhaps link-centric could be in a separate tab.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
